Curiosity eventually killed the cat right? So we applied our algorithm against both Barack Obama’s inaugural speech and the Book of Revelations in an effort to determine workd frequency compatibility. Oddly enough, we found some interesting stuff, and all of which we will detail.

For starts, the book of revelations contains 1298 unique words with a total of 12,008 words and Barack’s inaugural speech contained 892 unique words with a total of 2,489 words.

When you compare both sets and derive their word relevancy, Barack Obama’s inaugural speech is 63.15% compatible with the book of revelations.

Now what does that tell us? Some may think Barrack Obama’s inaugural speech was 63.15% evil and is evil and 36.85% good? Could the evilness this speech be a contributing factor to the global economic situation as it stands today? Or is this all just a theory and the relevancy of words just a standard rule in the English language where words are commonly used but hold no relevancy or relation to each other? We leave the decision to you.

But rest assured, we will be comparing many different speeches to the book of revelation. From your banks CEO to Nancy Pelosi. From CNN headlines to Fox news commentary. We are not constricted to just one source of work, but we want to better understand the connection between recent news and what’s evil. Before you comment, read the attached pdf for word relevancy proof.

Enjoy.

Your Greengostar.